mishtara.org

The Israel-Palestine conflict represents one of the world’s most enduring and complex disputes, with roots stretching back over a century. Understanding this conflict requires examining the historical forces that shaped the region and the competing national aspirations that continue to drive tensions today.

The Ottoman Legacy and British Mandate
The origins of the modern conflict trace back to the late 19th century when the Ottoman Empire controlled Palestine. During this period, Zionist movements began advocating for a Jewish homeland in the region, driven by rising antisemitism in Europe and a desire to return to what Jews considered their ancestral land.

The pivotal moment came in 1917 with the Balfour Declaration, when Britain pledged support for establishing a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine. This promise was made during World War I as Britain sought Jewish support for the war effort, but it fundamentally altered the demographic and political landscape of the region.

Following the Ottoman Empire’s defeat, Britain assumed control over Palestine under a League of Nations mandate. The British faced the challenging task of balancing their commitment to Jewish settlement with the rights of the existing Arab population, who comprised the majority of residents and had their own national aspirations.

The Road to Partition
Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, Jewish immigration to Palestine increased dramatically, particularly as Jews fled persecution in Europe. By 1947, the Jewish population had grown to approximately 630,000, representing just over 30% of the total population. This demographic shift intensified tensions between Jewish and Arab communities.

The Holocaust’s devastating impact on European Jewry added moral urgency to calls for a Jewish state. International sympathy for Holocaust survivors strengthened support for Zionist goals, while Palestinian Arabs felt their legitimate claims to the land were being overlooked.

In 1947, facing escalating violence and unable to reconcile competing claims, Britain turned to the United Nations. The UN proposed Resolution 181, known as the Partition Plan, which called for dividing Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states, with Jerusalem under international administration.

The Birth of Israel and Palestinian Displacement
The Arab world rejected the partition plan, arguing it unfairly allocated more land to the Jewish minority. However, on May 14, 1948, Jewish leaders declared Israel’s independence, immediately triggering the first Arab-Israeli War.

The 1948 war resulted in Israel’s military victory and territorial expansion beyond the original partition boundaries. Crucially, the conflict led to the displacement of approximately 750,000 Palestinians, who became refugees in neighboring Arab countries. This displacement, known to Palestinians as the Nakba or “catastrophe,” created a refugee crisis that persists today.

The war’s aftermath left the territory divided into three parts: the newly established State of Israel, the West Bank (controlled by Jordan), and the Gaza Strip (controlled by Egypt). No independent Palestinian state emerged, leaving Palestinian national aspirations unfulfilled.

Legacy of Historical Grievances
The historical foundations of the conflict established patterns that continue to influence Israeli-Palestinian relations. Both peoples developed competing narratives about their rights to the land, with Israelis emphasizing their historical connection and need for security, while Palestinians stressed their continuous presence and displacement.

These historical grievances became embedded in the collective memory of both societies, making compromise increasingly difficult. The failure to resolve core issues from the conflict’s origins—including borders, refugees, and Jerusalem’s status—continues to complicate peace efforts today.

Understanding this historical context is essential for comprehending why the Israel-Palestine conflict remains so intractable and why solutions must address not only contemporary security concerns but also the deep-rooted historical claims and grievances that fuel the ongoing dispute.

The year 2025 has marked a particularly turbulent period in Israel-Palestine relations, characterized by renewed warfare, failed ceasefire attempts, and a deepening humanitarian crisis that has drawn international condemnation and concern.

The Collapse of the January Ceasefire
The year began with cautious optimism when the United States, Egypt, and Qatar successfully mediated a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in January 2025, ending fifteen months of devastating warfare that had begun with Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel. The agreement was structured in multiple stages, with the first phase focusing on hostage exchanges and prisoner releases.

However, this fragile peace proved short-lived. On March 18, 2025, Israel announced the renewal of military operations against Hamas, claiming that the militant group had refused to accept an extension of the ceasefire’s first stage. Israel implemented a complete blockade of humanitarian aid to Gaza on March 2, creating what officials described as “famine-like conditions” across the territory.

The resumption of hostilities marked the beginning of what Israel termed “Operation Might and Sword,” with Israeli forces launching ground invasions into southern and central Gaza. The operation expanded significantly in May 2025, with Israel announcing plans to “capture” additional territory in Gaza and establish expanded security zones.

Humanitarian Crisis and International Response
The renewed conflict has created an unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. Israeli forces have continued intensive bombardment campaigns, striking markets, water distribution points, and civilian infrastructure. The death toll has exceeded 58,000 Palestinians since the conflict’s escalation in October 2023, with thousands more wounded and missing.

Israel’s restriction of humanitarian aid to just a few distribution sites has forced Palestinians to travel dangerous distances to access basic necessities. The United Nations has criticized this system as violating fundamental humanitarian principles, while international observers warn that vital “lifelines will vanish” without immediate fuel deliveries.

The humanitarian crisis has sparked global criticism and calls for intervention. The UN Secretary-General has emphasized the importance of adhering to international law and avoiding “any form of ethnic cleansing,” responding to controversial statements about potential Palestinian displacement.

Regional Escalation and International Involvement
The Gaza conflict has significantly escalated regional tensions throughout the Middle East. Israel has conducted ground operations in Lebanon following sustained cross-border attacks by Hezbollah, which began supporting Hamas after the October 7 attack. Yemen’s Houthi rebels have launched missiles at both Israeli territory and commercial shipping in the Red Sea, while Iran-backed groups have targeted U.S. military positions in Iraq and Syria.

Iran’s direct involvement reached unprecedented levels in 2024, with the Islamic Republic launching direct attacks on Israel in both April and October. Israel responded with counterstrikes targeting Iranian air defense systems and missile manufacturing facilities, bringing the two regional powers closer to direct confrontation than ever before.

The United States has maintained its support for Israel while attempting to mediate ceasefire agreements. President Trump’s administration has proposed controversial plans for Gaza’s future, including suggestions for temporary or permanent Palestinian relocation to enable reconstruction, though these proposals have faced strong opposition from Arab nations and the Palestinian Authority.

Political Stalemate and Governance Questions
The ongoing conflict has highlighted fundamental questions about Gaza’s future governance. Israel, the United States, and United Kingdom have all stated that Hamas cannot continue governing Gaza, while Israel has also opposed any role for the Palestinian Authority or UNRWA in the territory’s administration.

Some Hamas officials have indicated willingness to step down from governing Gaza but have refused to disarm, creating a complex political situation. The Arab League has proposed a three-stage plan for Gaza’s reconstruction, featuring a temporary technocratic committee excluding both Hamas and the Palestinian Authority, though implementation remains uncertain.

The Palestinian Authority itself faces internal challenges, having suspended Al Jazeera’s operations in Palestinian territories and dealing with ongoing violence in the West Bank, where Israeli military operations continue targeting various Palestinian groups.

Uncertain Path Forward
As 2025 progresses, the prospects for sustainable peace remain dim. Talks regarding new ceasefire agreements continue intermittently, but fundamental disagreements over Gaza’s future governance, security arrangements, and reconstruction plans persist. The international community remains divided on effective intervention strategies, while both Israeli and Palestinian societies bear the mounting costs of continued conflict.

The current situation represents a critical juncture in Israel-Palestine relations, with decisions made in 2025 likely to shape the conflict’s trajectory for years to come.

Despite decades of conflict, numerous attempts have been made to achieve lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians. Understanding these peace efforts—their successes, failures, and lessons learned—provides crucial insights into potential pathways forward in one of the world’s most intractable conflicts.

The Oslo Breakthrough and Its Legacy
The most significant breakthrough in Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts came with the Oslo Accords of 1993, which marked the first direct agreement between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization. This historic accord established the Palestinian Authority and created a framework for gradual Palestinian self-governance in parts of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

The Oslo process represented a fundamental shift in approach, with both sides recognizing each other’s legitimacy for the first time. Israel agreed to withdraw security forces from Gaza and redeploy those in the West Bank in phases, while the PLO formally recognized Israel’s right to exist and renounced terrorism. Palestine became the second Arab entity to recognize Israel, following Egypt’s lead after the Camp David Accords.

For several years, the Oslo framework created hope for a comprehensive resolution. The Palestinian Authority established governance structures and developed economic and security cooperation with Israel. This period saw the emergence of what many described as a “fully autonomous region with self-administration” in Palestinian territories.

However, the Oslo process ultimately failed to resolve core issues including final borders, the status of Jerusalem, Israeli settlements, and Palestinian refugees’ right of return. The outbreak of the Second Intifada in 2000 marked the violent collapse of the peace process, severely damaging trust between both societies.

Subsequent Peace Initiatives
Following Oslo’s breakdown, various international actors attempted to revive negotiations. The Camp David Accords of 1978 had earlier established a blueprint for Middle East peacemaking, addressing Palestinian autonomy alongside Egyptian-Israeli peace. This framework influenced subsequent efforts, including the 2010 direct talks orchestrated by President Barack Obama’s administration.

The 2010 negotiations aimed to forge a final agreement framework within one year, promoting a two-state solution that would officially end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. However, these talks faced immediate obstacles, including Israeli settlement expansion, Palestinian preconditions, and threats of violence from Hamas and Hezbollah if either side compromised.

The Quartet—comprising the United States, United Nations, European Union, and Russia—has played a significant role in peace efforts, though their initiatives have struggled to overcome fundamental disagreements between the parties. Various Arab League proposals and international conferences have similarly failed to achieve breakthrough progress.

Core Obstacles to Peace
Several persistent obstacles have hindered peace efforts throughout the decades. The settlement issue remains particularly contentious, with Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank creating facts on the ground that complicate territorial negotiations. Palestinians view settlements as violations of international law, while many Israelis consider areas like Judea and Samaria integral to their historical homeland.

Jerusalem’s status presents another seemingly intractable challenge. Israel has maintained that a united Jerusalem must remain its capital, while Palestinians insist on East Jerusalem as the capital of any future Palestinian state. The city’s religious significance to both Judaism and Islam adds spiritual dimensions to political disputes.

The Palestinian refugee question involves over four million people, including original refugees from 1948 and their descendants. Palestinians have traditionally demanded a “right of return” for these refugees, which Israel rejects as threatening the Jewish character of the state and logistically impossible to implement.

Security concerns deeply influence both sides’ positions. Many Israelis, particularly after experiencing suicide bombings during the Second Intifada, doubt Palestinian leadership’s ability to maintain control and prevent terrorism. Palestinians, meanwhile, view Israeli military operations and restrictions as collective punishment that undermines their sovereignty.

Changing Dynamics and New Approaches
Recent years have seen shifts in regional dynamics that could influence future peace efforts. The Abraham Accords normalized relations between Israel and several Arab states, potentially creating new diplomatic possibilities while also reducing Arab pressure for Palestinian statehood.

Some analysts suggest focusing on economic cooperation as a pathway to peace, promoting joint Israeli-Palestinian projects that could build trust and create stakeholders in peaceful resolution. Others advocate for gradual confidence-building measures rather than comprehensive final-status negotiations.

The rise of Hamas in Gaza has complicated peace efforts, as the organization refuses to recognize Israel and maintains armed resistance as its primary strategy. This has created a situation where Palestinian leadership is divided between the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza, making unified negotiations difficult.

Future Possibilities
Despite current pessimism, several factors could potentially facilitate future peace efforts. Generational changes in both societies might create new opportunities for dialogue. Economic incentives, including potential benefits from regional integration and international investment, could motivate compromise.

International pressure and changing geopolitical circumstances might also influence the parties’ calculations. Climate change, regional instability, and global economic trends could create new imperatives for cooperation.

However, any successful peace process will likely require addressing the fundamental issues that have stymied previous efforts: borders, security, refugees, and Jerusalem. Creative solutions that acknowledge both peoples’ legitimate aspirations while ensuring practical implementation will be essential for achieving lasting peace in this deeply contested region.